Skip to content

GSAP vs Microsoft

Based on 242 and 2421 real audits

View GSAP details | View Microsoft details
MetricGSAPMicrosoftWinner
Performance3539Microsoft
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8786GSAP
SEO9189GSAP
Security6566Microsoft
TTFB358ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7372GSAP
Performance
GSAP
35
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
GSAP
89
Microsoft
89
Security
GSAP
65
Microsoft
66
SEO
GSAP
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
GSAP
73
Microsoft
72

GSAP and Microsoft are closely matched, each leading in different categories. GSAP has a composite score of 73 while Microsoft scores 72.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 242 audited GSAP sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, GSAP or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, GSAP or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, GSAP or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, GSAP or Microsoft?
GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), GSAP or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 358 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose GSAP or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while GSAP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback