Skip to content

GSAP vs Rive

Based on 261 and 6 real audits

View GSAP details | View Rive details
MetricGSAPRiveWinner
Performance3638Rive
Accessibility8986GSAP
Best Practices8792Rive
SEO9194Rive
Security6674Rive
TTFB364ms159msRive
Composite7377Rive
Performance
GSAP
36
Rive
38
Accessibility
GSAP
89
Rive
86
Security
GSAP
66
Rive
74
SEO
GSAP
91
Rive
94
Composite
GSAP
73
Rive
77

Rive outperforms GSAP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). GSAP leads in accessibility.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Rive

Choose Rive when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 261 audited GSAP sites and 6 audited Rive sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, GSAP or Rive?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Rive sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, GSAP or Rive?
Rive sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, GSAP or Rive?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, GSAP or Rive?
Rive sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), GSAP or Rive?
Rive sites show lower Time to First Byte (159 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose GSAP or Rive for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Rive scores higher on overall composite score while GSAP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback