| Metric | GSAP | ScrollMagic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | GSAP |
| Best Practices | 87 | 83 | GSAP |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | GSAP |
| Security | 65 | 63 | GSAP |
| TTFB | 358ms | 383ms | GSAP |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | GSAP |
GSAP outperforms ScrollMagic in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). ScrollMagic leads in no categories.
Choose GSAP when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
ScrollMagic doesn't clearly lead GSAP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 242 audited GSAP sites and 21 audited ScrollMagic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback