Skip to content

Gutenberg vs HSTS

Based on 13 and 2827 real audits

View Gutenberg details | View HSTS details
MetricGutenbergHSTSWinner
Performance5350Gutenberg
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices9188Gutenberg
SEO9491Gutenberg
Security6671HSTS
TTFB784ms369msHSTS
Composite7676Tie
Performance
Gutenberg
53
HSTS
50
Accessibility
Gutenberg
87
HSTS
89
Security
Gutenberg
66
HSTS
71
SEO
Gutenberg
94
HSTS
91
Composite
Gutenberg
76
HSTS
76

Gutenberg and HSTS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Gutenberg has a composite score of 76 while HSTS scores 76.

When to choose Gutenberg

Choose Gutenberg when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited Gutenberg sites and 2827 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Gutenberg sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, Gutenberg or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Gutenberg sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Gutenberg or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (369 ms vs 784 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Gutenberg or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Gutenberg scores higher on overall composite score while Gutenberg may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback