Skip to content

Gutenberg vs HSTS

Based on 12 and 2556 real audits

View Gutenberg details | View HSTS details
MetricGutenbergHSTSWinner
Performance5449Gutenberg
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices9288Gutenberg
SEO9491Gutenberg
Security6570HSTS
TTFB212ms364msGutenberg
Composite7675Gutenberg
Performance
Gutenberg
54
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Gutenberg
87
HSTS
89
Security
Gutenberg
65
HSTS
70
SEO
Gutenberg
94
HSTS
91
Composite
Gutenberg
76
HSTS
75

Gutenberg outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose Gutenberg

Choose Gutenberg when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited Gutenberg sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Gutenberg sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, Gutenberg or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Gutenberg or HSTS?
Gutenberg sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Gutenberg or HSTS?
Gutenberg sites show lower Time to First Byte (212 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Gutenberg or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Gutenberg scores higher on overall composite score while Gutenberg may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback