Skip to content

Hammer.js vs HSTS

Based on 98 and 3210 real audits

View Hammer.js details | View HSTS details
MetricHammer.jsHSTSWinner
Performance4053HSTS
Accessibility8590HSTS
Best Practices8589HSTS
SEO9192HSTS
Security6573HSTS
TTFB493ms398msHSTS
Composite7377HSTS
Performance
Hammer.js
40
HSTS
53
Accessibility
Hammer.js
85
HSTS
90
Security
Hammer.js
65
HSTS
73
SEO
Hammer.js
91
HSTS
92
Composite
Hammer.js
73
HSTS
77

HSTS outperforms Hammer.js in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Hammer.js leads in no categories.

When to choose Hammer.js

Hammer.js doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 98 audited Hammer.js sites and 3210 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Hammer.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Hammer.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hammer.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hammer.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hammer.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (398 ms vs 493 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hammer.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Hammer.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback