Skip to content

Hammer.js vs HSTS

Based on 93 and 2556 real audits

View Hammer.js details | View HSTS details
MetricHammer.jsHSTSWinner
Performance4049HSTS
Accessibility8589HSTS
Best Practices8488HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security6470HSTS
TTFB500ms364msHSTS
Composite7275HSTS
Performance
Hammer.js
40
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Hammer.js
85
HSTS
89
Security
Hammer.js
64
HSTS
70
SEO
Hammer.js
91
HSTS
91
Composite
Hammer.js
72
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Hammer.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Hammer.js leads in no categories.

When to choose Hammer.js

Hammer.js doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 93 audited Hammer.js sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Hammer.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Hammer.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hammer.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hammer.js or HSTS?
Hammer.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hammer.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 500 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hammer.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Hammer.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback