Skip to content

Hammer.js vs SWFObject

Based on 17 and 2 real audits

View Hammer.js details | View SWFObject details
MetricHammer.jsSWFObjectWinner
Performance3931Hammer.js
Accessibility8476Hammer.js
Best Practices8877Hammer.js
SEO9196SWFObject
Security6662Hammer.js
TTFB937ms953msHammer.js
Composite7268Hammer.js
Performance
Hammer.js
39
SWFObject
31
Accessibility
Hammer.js
84
SWFObject
76
Security
Hammer.js
66
SWFObject
62
SEO
Hammer.js
91
SWFObject
96
Composite
Hammer.js
72
SWFObject
68

Hammer.js outperforms SWFObject in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). SWFObject leads in SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hammer.js or SWFObject?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Hammer.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Hammer.js or SWFObject?
Hammer.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Should I choose Hammer.js or SWFObject for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Hammer.js scores higher on performance while Hammer.js may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback