| Metric | hCaptcha | HSTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 46 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | HSTS |
| SEO | 94 | 90 | hCaptcha |
| Security | 70 | 68 | hCaptcha |
| TTFB | 335ms | 344ms | hCaptcha |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | hCaptcha |
hCaptcha outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). HSTS leads in performance, best practices.
Choose hCaptcha when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 27 audited hCaptcha sites and 2231 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback