Based on 1 and 17 real audits
| Metric | Helix Ultimate | Joomla | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 60 | Joomla |
| Accessibility | 95 | 85 | Helix Ultimate |
| Best Practices | 96 | 90 | Helix Ultimate |
| SEO | 100 | 92 | Helix Ultimate |
| Security | 77 | 70 | Helix Ultimate |
| TTFB | 2331ms | 538ms | Joomla |
| Composite | 79 | 76 | Helix Ultimate |
Helix Ultimate outperforms Joomla in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 76). Joomla leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Helix Ultimate when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Joomla when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Helix Ultimate sites and 17 audited Joomla sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback