Skip to content

Heroku vs HSTS

Based on 11 and 3098 real audits

View Heroku details | View HSTS details
MetricHerokuHSTSWinner
Performance4452HSTS
Accessibility8889HSTS
Best Practices8889HSTS
SEO9492Heroku
Security7073HSTS
TTFB201ms397msHeroku
Composite7777Tie
Performance
Heroku
44
HSTS
52
Accessibility
Heroku
88
HSTS
89
Security
Heroku
70
HSTS
73
SEO
Heroku
94
HSTS
92
Composite
Heroku
77
HSTS
77

HSTS outperforms Heroku in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 77). Heroku leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Heroku

Choose Heroku when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 11 audited Heroku sites and 3098 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Heroku or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Heroku or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Heroku or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Heroku or HSTS?
Heroku sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Heroku or HSTS?
Heroku sites show lower Time to First Byte (201 ms vs 397 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Heroku or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Heroku may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback