Skip to content

Heroku vs HSTS

Based on 10 and 2557 real audits

View Heroku details | View HSTS details
MetricHerokuHSTSWinner
Performance4449HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8788HSTS
SEO9591Heroku
Security6870HSTS
TTFB132ms364msHeroku
Composite7675Heroku
Performance
Heroku
44
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Heroku
89
HSTS
89
Security
Heroku
68
HSTS
70
SEO
Heroku
95
HSTS
91
Composite
Heroku
76
HSTS
75

Heroku and HSTS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Heroku has a composite score of 76 while HSTS scores 75.

When to choose Heroku

Choose Heroku when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 10 audited Heroku sites and 2557 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Heroku or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Heroku or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Heroku or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Heroku (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Heroku or HSTS?
Heroku sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Heroku or HSTS?
Heroku sites show lower Time to First Byte (132 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Heroku or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Heroku may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback