Based on 5 and 134 real audits
| Metric | Hetzner | Matomo Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 74 | 52 | Hetzner |
| Accessibility | 86 | 88 | Matomo Analytics |
| Best Practices | 96 | 89 | Hetzner |
| SEO | 93 | 90 | Hetzner |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Hetzner |
| TTFB | 410ms | 430ms | Hetzner |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | Hetzner |
Hetzner outperforms Matomo Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in accessibility.
Choose Hetzner when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Hetzner sites and 134 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback