| Metric | Hetzner | Swiper | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 74 | 38 | Hetzner |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 96 | 86 | Hetzner |
| SEO | 93 | 90 | Hetzner |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Hetzner |
| TTFB | 410ms | 412ms | Hetzner |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Hetzner |
Hetzner outperforms Swiper in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Swiper leads in no categories.
Choose Hetzner when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Swiper doesn't clearly lead Hetzner in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Hetzner sites and 498 audited Swiper sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback