Skip to content

Highlight.js vs HSTS

Based on 32 and 3370 real audits

View Highlight.js details | View HSTS details
MetricHighlight.jsHSTSWinner
Performance4853HSTS
Accessibility8590HSTS
Best Practices9089Highlight.js
SEO8991HSTS
Security6574HSTS
TTFB267ms410msHighlight.js
Composite7478HSTS
Performance
Highlight.js
48
HSTS
53
Accessibility
Highlight.js
85
HSTS
90
Security
Highlight.js
65
HSTS
74
SEO
Highlight.js
89
HSTS
91
Composite
Highlight.js
74
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Highlight.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Highlight.js leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Highlight.js

Choose Highlight.js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 32 audited Highlight.js sites and 3370 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Highlight.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Highlight.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Highlight.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Highlight.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Highlight.js or HSTS?
Highlight.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (267 ms vs 410 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Highlight.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Highlight.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback