Skip to content

History vs styled-components

Based on 1 and 170 real audits

View History details | View styled-components details
MetricHistorystyled-componentsWinner
Performance5933History
Accessibility3989styled-components
Best Practices8185styled-components
SEO9293styled-components
Security6365styled-components
TTFB1287ms321msstyled-components
Composite7372History
Performance
History
59
styled-components
33
Accessibility
History
39
styled-components
89
Security
History
63
styled-components
65
SEO
History
92
styled-components
93
Composite
History
73
styled-components
72

styled-components outperforms History in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). History leads in performance, composite score.

When to choose History

Choose History when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose styled-components

Choose styled-components when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited History sites and 170 audited styled-components sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, History or styled-components?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, History sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, History or styled-components?
styled-components sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, History or styled-components?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor styled-components (89 vs 39). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, History or styled-components?
styled-components sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), History or styled-components?
styled-components sites show lower Time to First Byte (321 ms vs 1287 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose History or styled-components for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. History scores higher on overall composite score while History may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback