Skip to content

Hogan.js vs HSTS

Based on 2 and 2214 real audits

View Hogan.js details | View HSTS details
MetricHogan.jsHSTSWinner
Performance2946HSTS
Accessibility8988Hogan.js
Best Practices8687HSTS
SEO9290Hogan.js
Security6268HSTS
TTFB223ms343msHogan.js
Composite7274HSTS
Performance
Hogan.js
29
HSTS
46
Accessibility
Hogan.js
89
HSTS
88
Security
Hogan.js
62
HSTS
68
SEO
Hogan.js
92
HSTS
90
Composite
Hogan.js
72
HSTS
74

HSTS outperforms Hogan.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Hogan.js leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Hogan.js

Choose Hogan.js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Hogan.js sites and 2214 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hogan.js or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Hogan.js or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hogan.js or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Hogan.js (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hogan.js or HSTS?
Hogan.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hogan.js or HSTS?
Hogan.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (223 ms vs 343 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hogan.js or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Hogan.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback