Skip to content

Hostinger CDN vs HTTP/3

Based on 1 and 1646 real audits

View Hostinger CDN details | View HTTP/3 details
MetricHostinger CDNHTTP/3Winner
Performance6652Hostinger CDN
Accessibility9688Hostinger CDN
Best Practices10088Hostinger CDN
SEO9291Hostinger CDN
Security8070Hostinger CDN
TTFB262ms321msHostinger CDN
Composite8376Hostinger CDN
Performance
Hostinger CDN
66
HTTP/3
52
Accessibility
Hostinger CDN
96
HTTP/3
88
Security
Hostinger CDN
80
HTTP/3
70
SEO
Hostinger CDN
92
HTTP/3
91
Composite
Hostinger CDN
83
HTTP/3
76

Hostinger CDN outperforms HTTP/3 in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 76). HTTP/3 leads in no categories.

When to choose Hostinger CDN

Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HTTP/3

HTTP/3 doesn't clearly lead Hostinger CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Hostinger CDN sites and 1646 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Hostinger CDN sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3?
Hostinger CDN sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Hostinger CDN (96 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3?
Hostinger CDN sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3?
Hostinger CDN sites show lower Time to First Byte (262 ms vs 321 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hostinger CDN or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Hostinger CDN scores higher on overall composite score while Hostinger CDN may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback