Based on 1 and 72 real audits
| Metric | Hostinger CDN | LiteSpeed | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 66 | 59 | Hostinger CDN |
| Accessibility | 96 | 88 | Hostinger CDN |
| Best Practices | 100 | 91 | Hostinger CDN |
| SEO | 92 | 93 | LiteSpeed |
| Security | 80 | 74 | Hostinger CDN |
| TTFB | 262ms | 889ms | Hostinger CDN |
| Composite | 83 | 80 | Hostinger CDN |
Hostinger CDN outperforms LiteSpeed in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 80). LiteSpeed leads in SEO.
Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose LiteSpeed when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Hostinger CDN sites and 72 audited LiteSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback