Skip to content

Hostinger CDN vs Litespeed Cache

Based on 1 and 40 real audits

View Hostinger CDN details | View Litespeed Cache details
MetricHostinger CDNLitespeed CacheWinner
Performance6659Hostinger CDN
Accessibility9690Hostinger CDN
Best Practices10092Hostinger CDN
SEO9292Tie
Security8074Hostinger CDN
TTFB262ms1178msHostinger CDN
Composite8380Hostinger CDN
Performance
Hostinger CDN
66
Litespeed Cache
59
Accessibility
Hostinger CDN
96
Litespeed Cache
90
Security
Hostinger CDN
80
Litespeed Cache
74
SEO
Hostinger CDN
92
Litespeed Cache
92
Composite
Hostinger CDN
83
Litespeed Cache
80

Hostinger CDN outperforms Litespeed Cache in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 80). Litespeed Cache leads in no categories.

When to choose Hostinger CDN

Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Litespeed Cache

Litespeed Cache doesn't clearly lead Hostinger CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Hostinger CDN sites and 40 audited Litespeed Cache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Hostinger CDN sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 59 on average).
Which has better security, Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache?
Hostinger CDN sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 74 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Hostinger CDN (96 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache?
Hostinger CDN sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache?
Hostinger CDN sites show lower Time to First Byte (262 ms vs 1178 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hostinger CDN or Litespeed Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Hostinger CDN scores higher on overall composite score while Hostinger CDN may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback