Based on 9 and 2640 real audits
| Metric | Hostinger CDN | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 51 | Hostinger CDN |
| Accessibility | 94 | 91 | Hostinger CDN |
| Best Practices | 93 | 90 | Hostinger CDN |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 80 | 74 | Hostinger CDN |
| TTFB | 405ms | 468ms | Hostinger CDN |
| Composite | 83 | 79 | Hostinger CDN |
Hostinger CDN outperforms Priority Hints in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 79). Priority Hints leads in no categories.
Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Priority Hints doesn't clearly lead Hostinger CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 9 audited Hostinger CDN sites and 2640 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback