Based on 12 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Hostinger | Hostinger CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 65 | 66 | Hostinger CDN |
| Accessibility | 88 | 96 | Hostinger CDN |
| Best Practices | 92 | 100 | Hostinger CDN |
| SEO | 95 | 92 | Hostinger |
| Security | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| TTFB | 1080ms | 262ms | Hostinger CDN |
| Composite | 82 | 83 | Hostinger CDN |
Hostinger CDN outperforms Hostinger in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 82). Hostinger leads in SEO.
Choose Hostinger when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 12 audited Hostinger sites and 1 audited Hostinger CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback