| Metric | Hotjar | Uptrends | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 37 | Uptrends |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Uptrends |
| Best Practices | 80 | 88 | Uptrends |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Hotjar |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Hotjar |
| TTFB | 347ms | 488ms | Hotjar |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Hotjar and Uptrends are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Hotjar has a composite score of 72 while Uptrends scores 72.
Choose Hotjar when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Uptrends when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 142 audited Hotjar sites and 2 audited Uptrends sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback