Skip to content

Hotjar vs Webgains

Based on 142 and 1 real audits

View Hotjar details | View Webgains details
MetricHotjarWebgainsWinner
Performance3237Webgains
Accessibility9076Hotjar
Best Practices8088Webgains
SEO9092Webgains
Security6459Hotjar
TTFB347ms585msHotjar
Composite7269Hotjar
Performance
Hotjar
32
Webgains
37
Accessibility
Hotjar
90
Webgains
76
Security
Hotjar
64
Webgains
59
SEO
Hotjar
90
Webgains
92
Composite
Hotjar
72
Webgains
69

Hotjar outperforms Webgains in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Webgains leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Hotjar

Choose Hotjar when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webgains

Choose Webgains when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 142 audited Hotjar sites and 1 audited Webgains sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Hotjar or Webgains?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Webgains sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, Hotjar or Webgains?
Hotjar sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 59 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Hotjar or Webgains?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Hotjar (90 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Hotjar or Webgains?
Webgains sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Hotjar or Webgains?
Hotjar sites show lower Time to First Byte (347 ms vs 585 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Hotjar or Webgains for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Webgains scores higher on overall composite score while Hotjar may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback