Skip to content

HSTS vs IconScout

Based on 2601 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View IconScout details
MetricHSTSIconScoutWinner
Performance4850IconScout
Accessibility8995IconScout
Best Practices8896IconScout
SEO9185HSTS
Security7068HSTS
TTFB365ms658msHSTS
Composite7570HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
IconScout
50
Accessibility
HSTS
89
IconScout
95
Security
HSTS
70
IconScout
68
SEO
HSTS
91
IconScout
85
Composite
HSTS
75
IconScout
70

HSTS outperforms IconScout in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 70). IconScout leads in performance, accessibility, best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose IconScout

Choose IconScout when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2601 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited IconScout sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or IconScout?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, IconScout sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or IconScout?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or IconScout?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor IconScout (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or IconScout?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or IconScout?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 658 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or IconScout for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. IconScout scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback