Skip to content

HSTS vs Imgix

Based on 3637 and 32 real audits

View HSTS details | View Imgix details
MetricHSTSImgixWinner
Performance5438HSTS
Accessibility9086HSTS
Best Practices9087HSTS
SEO9292Tie
Security7466HSTS
TTFB421ms263msImgix
Composite7873HSTS
Performance
HSTS
54
Imgix
38
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Imgix
86
Security
HSTS
74
Imgix
66
SEO
HSTS
92
Imgix
92
Composite
HSTS
78
Imgix
73

HSTS outperforms Imgix in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Imgix leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Imgix

Choose Imgix when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3637 audited HSTS sites and 32 audited Imgix sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Imgix?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Imgix?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Imgix?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Imgix?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Imgix?
Imgix sites show lower Time to First Byte (263 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Imgix for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback