Skip to content

HSTS vs Infolinks

Based on 2214 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Infolinks details
MetricHSTSInfolinksWinner
Performance4695Infolinks
Accessibility8891Infolinks
Best Practices87100Infolinks
SEO90100Infolinks
Security6861HSTS
TTFB343ms367msHSTS
Composite7474Tie
Performance
HSTS
46
Infolinks
95
Accessibility
HSTS
88
Infolinks
91
Security
HSTS
68
Infolinks
61
SEO
HSTS
90
Infolinks
100
Composite
HSTS
74
Infolinks
74

Infolinks outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). HSTS leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Infolinks

Choose Infolinks when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2214 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Infolinks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Infolinks?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Infolinks sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (95 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Infolinks?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Infolinks?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Infolinks (91 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Infolinks?
Infolinks sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Infolinks?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (343 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Infolinks for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Infolinks scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback