Skip to content

HSTS vs InterRed

Based on 2599 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View InterRed details
MetricHSTSInterRedWinner
Performance4838HSTS
Accessibility8984HSTS
Best Practices8896InterRed
SEO9192InterRed
Security7064HSTS
TTFB365ms646msHSTS
Composite7576InterRed
Performance
HSTS
48
InterRed
38
Accessibility
HSTS
89
InterRed
84
Security
HSTS
70
InterRed
64
SEO
HSTS
91
InterRed
92
Composite
HSTS
75
InterRed
76

HSTS outperforms InterRed in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 76). InterRed leads in best practices, SEO, composite score.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose InterRed

Choose InterRed when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2599 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited InterRed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or InterRed?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or InterRed?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or InterRed?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or InterRed?
InterRed sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or InterRed?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 646 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or InterRed for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback