Skip to content

HSTS vs Jetboost

Based on 2556 and 3 real audits

View HSTS details | View Jetboost details
MetricHSTSJetboostWinner
Performance4939HSTS
Accessibility8995Jetboost
Best Practices8896Jetboost
SEO9197Jetboost
Security7066HSTS
TTFB364ms302msJetboost
Composite7576Jetboost
Performance
HSTS
49
Jetboost
39
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Jetboost
95
Security
HSTS
70
Jetboost
66
SEO
HSTS
91
Jetboost
97
Composite
HSTS
75
Jetboost
76

Jetboost outperforms HSTS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in performance, security.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Jetboost

Choose Jetboost when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited Jetboost sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Jetboost?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Jetboost?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Jetboost?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Jetboost (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Jetboost?
Jetboost sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Jetboost?
Jetboost sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Jetboost for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback