| Metric | HSTS | Jetpack Boost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 54 | Jetpack Boost |
| Accessibility | 89 | 92 | Jetpack Boost |
| Best Practices | 88 | 77 | HSTS |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Jetpack Boost |
| Security | 70 | 63 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 364ms | 262ms | Jetpack Boost |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | HSTS |
Jetpack Boost outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). HSTS leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Jetpack Boost when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited Jetpack Boost sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback