Skip to content

HSTS vs Laravel

Based on 2656 and 22 real audits

View HSTS details | View Laravel details
MetricHSTSLaravelWinner
Performance4952Laravel
Accessibility8982HSTS
Best Practices8891Laravel
SEO9196Laravel
Security7066HSTS
TTFB381ms987msHSTS
Composite7574HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
Laravel
52
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Laravel
82
Security
HSTS
70
Laravel
66
SEO
HSTS
91
Laravel
96
Composite
HSTS
75
Laravel
74

HSTS outperforms Laravel in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Laravel leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Laravel

Choose Laravel when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2656 audited HSTS sites and 22 audited Laravel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Laravel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Laravel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Laravel?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Laravel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Laravel?
Laravel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Laravel?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (381 ms vs 987 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Laravel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Laravel scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback