Skip to content

HSTS vs Lenis

Based on 3370 and 20 real audits

View HSTS details | View Lenis details
MetricHSTSLenisWinner
Performance5338HSTS
Accessibility9089HSTS
Best Practices8991Lenis
SEO9193Lenis
Security7472HSTS
TTFB410ms429msHSTS
Composite7877HSTS
Performance
HSTS
53
Lenis
38
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Lenis
89
Security
HSTS
74
Lenis
72
SEO
HSTS
91
Lenis
93
Composite
HSTS
78
Lenis
77

HSTS outperforms Lenis in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 77). Lenis leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lenis

Choose Lenis when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3370 audited HSTS sites and 20 audited Lenis sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Lenis?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Lenis?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 72 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Lenis?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Lenis?
Lenis sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Lenis?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (410 ms vs 429 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Lenis for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback