Skip to content

HSTS vs Linkedin Sign-in

Based on 338 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Linkedin Sign-in details
MetricHSTSLinkedin Sign-inWinner
Performance4765Linkedin Sign-in
Accessibility90100Linkedin Sign-in
Best Practices9096Linkedin Sign-in
SEO92100Linkedin Sign-in
Security6771Linkedin Sign-in
TTFB370ms279msLinkedin Sign-in
Composite7579Linkedin Sign-in
Performance
HSTS
47
Linkedin Sign-in
65
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Linkedin Sign-in
100
Security
HSTS
67
Linkedin Sign-in
71
SEO
HSTS
92
Linkedin Sign-in
100
Composite
HSTS
75
Linkedin Sign-in
79

Linkedin Sign-in outperforms HSTS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). HSTS leads in no categories.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Linkedin Sign-in?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linkedin Sign-in sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (65 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Linkedin Sign-in?
Linkedin Sign-in sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 67 on average).
Should I choose HSTS or Linkedin Sign-in for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linkedin Sign-in scores higher on performance while HSTS may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback