Skip to content

HSTS vs Linode/Akamai

Based on 2557 and 5 real audits

View HSTS details | View Linode/Akamai details
MetricHSTSLinode/AkamaiWinner
Performance4969Linode/Akamai
Accessibility8976HSTS
Best Practices8893Linode/Akamai
SEO9191Tie
Security7063HSTS
TTFB364ms600msHSTS
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
Linode/Akamai
69
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Linode/Akamai
76
Security
HSTS
70
Linode/Akamai
63
SEO
HSTS
91
Linode/Akamai
91
Composite
HSTS
75
Linode/Akamai
73

HSTS outperforms Linode/Akamai in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Linode/Akamai leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Linode/Akamai

Choose Linode/Akamai when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2557 audited HSTS sites and 5 audited Linode/Akamai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Linode/Akamai?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linode/Akamai sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (69 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Linode/Akamai?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Linode/Akamai?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Linode/Akamai?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Linode/Akamai?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 600 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Linode/Akamai for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linode/Akamai scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback