Based on 2852 and 2 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Locomotive Scroll | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 41 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 81 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 84 | HSTS |
| Security | 71 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 369ms | 287ms | Locomotive Scroll |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Locomotive Scroll in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Locomotive Scroll leads in TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Locomotive Scroll when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2852 audited HSTS sites and 2 audited Locomotive Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback