Skip to content

HSTS vs Magnite

Based on 2601 and 2 real audits

View HSTS details | View Magnite details
MetricHSTSMagniteWinner
Performance4830HSTS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8879HSTS
SEO9188HSTS
Security7073Magnite
TTFB365ms335msMagnite
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Magnite
30
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Magnite
89
Security
HSTS
70
Magnite
73
SEO
HSTS
91
Magnite
88
Composite
HSTS
75
Magnite
73

HSTS outperforms Magnite in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Magnite leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Magnite

Choose Magnite when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2601 audited HSTS sites and 2 audited Magnite sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Magnite?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Magnite?
Magnite sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Magnite?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Magnite?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Magnite?
Magnite sites show lower Time to First Byte (335 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Magnite for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback