Skip to content

HSTS vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 3294 and 161 real audits

View HSTS details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricHSTSMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance5352HSTS
Accessibility9088HSTS
Best Practices8990Matomo Analytics
SEO9291HSTS
Security7367HSTS
TTFB403ms424msHSTS
Composite7875HSTS
Performance
HSTS
53
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
HSTS
73
Matomo Analytics
67
SEO
HSTS
92
Matomo Analytics
91
Composite
HSTS
78
Matomo Analytics
75

HSTS outperforms Matomo Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Matomo Analytics leads in best practices.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 161 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Matomo Analytics?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Matomo Analytics?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Matomo Analytics?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 424 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback