Based on 3098 and 33 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Matomo Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 48 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 89 | 90 | Matomo Tag Manager |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | HSTS |
| Security | 73 | 67 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 397ms | 320ms | Matomo Tag Manager |
| Composite | 77 | 75 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Matomo Tag Manager in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Matomo Tag Manager leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Matomo Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3098 audited HSTS sites and 33 audited Matomo Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback