| Metric | HSTS | Mautic | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 28 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 92 | Mautic |
| Best Practices | 90 | 84 | HSTS |
| SEO | 92 | 94 | Mautic |
| Security | 74 | 70 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 421ms | 426ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 78 | 74 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Mautic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Mautic leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Mautic when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3637 audited HSTS sites and 13 audited Mautic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback