Skip to content

HSTS vs Mautic

Based on 3637 and 13 real audits

MetricHSTSMauticWinner
Performance5428HSTS
Accessibility9092Mautic
Best Practices9084HSTS
SEO9294Mautic
Security7470HSTS
TTFB421ms426msHSTS
Composite7874HSTS
Performance
HSTS
54
Mautic
28
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Mautic
92
Security
HSTS
74
Mautic
70
SEO
HSTS
92
Mautic
94
Composite
HSTS
78
Mautic
74

HSTS outperforms Mautic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Mautic leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mautic

Choose Mautic when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3637 audited HSTS sites and 13 audited Mautic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Mautic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Mautic?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Mautic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mautic (92 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Mautic?
Mautic sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Mautic?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (421 ms vs 426 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Mautic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback