Skip to content

HSTS vs Media.net

Based on 3294 and 10 real audits

View HSTS details | View Media.net details
MetricHSTSMedia.netWinner
Performance5324HSTS
Accessibility9087HSTS
Best Practices8976HSTS
SEO9285HSTS
Security7370HSTS
TTFB403ms200msMedia.net
Composite7874HSTS
Performance
HSTS
53
Media.net
24
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Media.net
87
Security
HSTS
73
Media.net
70
SEO
HSTS
92
Media.net
85
Composite
HSTS
78
Media.net
74

HSTS outperforms Media.net in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Media.net leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Media.net

Choose Media.net when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 10 audited Media.net sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Media.net?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Media.net?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Media.net?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Media.net?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Media.net?
Media.net sites show lower Time to First Byte (200 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Media.net for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback