Based on 3096 and 6 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Microsoft Power BI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 52 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Microsoft Power BI |
| Best Practices | 89 | 90 | Microsoft Power BI |
| SEO | 92 | 93 | Microsoft Power BI |
| Security | 73 | 67 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 397ms | 560ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | HSTS |
HSTS and Microsoft Power BI are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 77 while Microsoft Power BI scores 76.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft Power BI when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3096 audited HSTS sites and 6 audited Microsoft Power BI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback