| Metric | HSTS | Mutiny | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 22 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Mutiny |
| Best Practices | 88 | 85 | HSTS |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 70 | 71 | Mutiny |
| TTFB | 364ms | 421ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Mutiny in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Mutiny leads in accessibility, security.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Mutiny when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 5 audited Mutiny sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback