Skip to content

HSTS vs MyFonts

Based on 2556 and 5 real audits

View HSTS details | View MyFonts details
MetricHSTSMyFontsWinner
Performance4940HSTS
Accessibility8991MyFonts
Best Practices8893MyFonts
SEO9187HSTS
Security7070Tie
TTFB364ms182msMyFonts
Composite7574HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
MyFonts
40
Accessibility
HSTS
89
MyFonts
91
Security
HSTS
70
MyFonts
70
SEO
HSTS
91
MyFonts
87
Composite
HSTS
75
MyFonts
74

HSTS and MyFonts are closely matched, each leading in different categories. HSTS has a composite score of 75 while MyFonts scores 74.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MyFonts

Choose MyFonts when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 5 audited MyFonts sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or MyFonts?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or MyFonts?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or MyFonts?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor MyFonts (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or MyFonts?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or MyFonts?
MyFonts sites show lower Time to First Byte (182 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or MyFonts for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback