Skip to content

HSTS vs Native app preferred

Based on 3295 and 124 real audits

MetricHSTSNative app preferredWinner
Performance5238HSTS
Accessibility9086HSTS
Best Practices8986HSTS
SEO9292Tie
Security7367HSTS
TTFB403ms309msNative app preferred
Composite7873HSTS
Performance
HSTS
52
Native app preferred
38
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Native app preferred
86
Security
HSTS
73
Native app preferred
67
SEO
HSTS
92
Native app preferred
92
Composite
HSTS
78
Native app preferred
73

HSTS outperforms Native app preferred in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Native app preferred leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Native app preferred

Choose Native app preferred when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3295 audited HSTS sites and 124 audited Native app preferred sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Native app preferred?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Native app preferred?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Native app preferred?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Native app preferred?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Native app preferred?
Native app preferred sites show lower Time to First Byte (309 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Native app preferred for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback