| Metric | HSTS | Netlify | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 63 | Netlify |
| Accessibility | 89 | 91 | Netlify |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | Netlify |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Netlify |
| Security | 71 | 72 | Netlify |
| TTFB | 369ms | 357ms | Netlify |
| Composite | 76 | 79 | Netlify |
Netlify outperforms HSTS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 76). HSTS leads in no categories.
HSTS doesn't clearly lead Netlify in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Netlify when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2853 audited HSTS sites and 86 audited Netlify sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback