| Metric | HSTS | Netlify | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 61 | Netlify |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Netlify |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | Netlify |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Netlify |
| Security | 69 | 68 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 357ms | 327ms | Netlify |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Netlify |
Netlify outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). HSTS leads in security.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Netlify when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2492 audited HSTS sites and 66 audited Netlify sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback