| Metric | HSTS | Netlify CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 62 | Netlify CDN |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Netlify CDN |
| Best Practices | 88 | 92 | Netlify CDN |
| SEO | 91 | 95 | Netlify CDN |
| Security | 69 | 69 | Tie |
| TTFB | 357ms | 352ms | Netlify CDN |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Netlify CDN |
Netlify CDN outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). HSTS leads in no categories.
HSTS doesn't clearly lead Netlify CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Netlify CDN when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2492 audited HSTS sites and 55 audited Netlify CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback