| Metric | HSTS | Netlify CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 62 | Netlify CDN |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | Netlify CDN |
| Best Practices | 87 | 92 | Netlify CDN |
| SEO | 90 | 95 | Netlify CDN |
| Security | 70 | 69 | HSTS |
| TTFB | 364ms | 360ms | Netlify CDN |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Netlify CDN |
Netlify CDN outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). HSTS leads in security.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Netlify CDN when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2601 audited HSTS sites and 56 audited Netlify CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback