| Metric | HSTS | Netlify Forms | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 32 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 100 | Netlify Forms |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Netlify Forms |
| Security | 74 | 77 | Netlify Forms |
| TTFB | 409ms | 1374ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 78 | 80 | Netlify Forms |
Netlify Forms outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 78). HSTS leads in performance, accessibility, TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Netlify Forms when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3346 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Netlify Forms sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback