Skip to content

HSTS vs Next.js App Router

Based on 2488 and 228 real audits

View HSTS details | View Next.js App Router details
MetricHSTSNext.js App RouterWinner
Performance4840HSTS
Accessibility8990Next.js App Router
Best Practices8788Next.js App Router
SEO9194Next.js App Router
Security6968HSTS
TTFB354ms308msNext.js App Router
Composite7574HSTS
Performance
HSTS
48
Next.js App Router
40
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Next.js App Router
90
Security
HSTS
69
Next.js App Router
68
SEO
HSTS
91
Next.js App Router
94
Composite
HSTS
75
Next.js App Router
74

Next.js App Router outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). HSTS leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Next.js App Router

Choose Next.js App Router when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2488 audited HSTS sites and 228 audited Next.js App Router sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Next.js App Router?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Next.js App Router?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Next.js App Router?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Next.js App Router (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Next.js App Router?
Next.js App Router sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Next.js App Router?
Next.js App Router sites show lower Time to First Byte (308 ms vs 354 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Next.js App Router for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback