Skip to content

HSTS vs Normalize.css

Based on 2214 and 1 real audits

View HSTS details | View Normalize.css details
MetricHSTSNormalize.cssWinner
Performance4616HSTS
Accessibility8880HSTS
Best Practices8777HSTS
SEO9085HSTS
Security6879Normalize.css
TTFB343ms56msNormalize.css
Composite7479Normalize.css
Performance
HSTS
46
Normalize.css
16
Accessibility
HSTS
88
Normalize.css
80
Security
HSTS
68
Normalize.css
79
SEO
HSTS
90
Normalize.css
85
Composite
HSTS
74
Normalize.css
79

HSTS outperforms Normalize.css in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 79). Normalize.css leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Normalize.css

Choose Normalize.css when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2214 audited HSTS sites and 1 audited Normalize.css sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Normalize.css?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 16 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Normalize.css?
Normalize.css sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Normalize.css?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (88 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Normalize.css?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Normalize.css?
Normalize.css sites show lower Time to First Byte (56 ms vs 343 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Normalize.css for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback