| Metric | HSTS | Odoo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 48 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | Odoo |
| SEO | 91 | 81 | HSTS |
| Security | 71 | 77 | Odoo |
| TTFB | 369ms | 798ms | HSTS |
| Composite | 76 | 80 | Odoo |
HSTS outperforms Odoo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 80). Odoo leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Odoo when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2854 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited Odoo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback