Skip to content

HSTS vs OpenResty

Based on 3297 and 57 real audits

View HSTS details | View OpenResty details
MetricHSTSOpenRestyWinner
Performance5349HSTS
Accessibility9084HSTS
Best Practices8987HSTS
SEO9290HSTS
Security7368HSTS
TTFB403ms505msHSTS
Composite7874HSTS
Performance
HSTS
53
OpenResty
49
Accessibility
HSTS
90
OpenResty
84
Security
HSTS
73
OpenResty
68
SEO
HSTS
92
OpenResty
90
Composite
HSTS
78
OpenResty
74

HSTS outperforms OpenResty in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). OpenResty leads in no categories.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenResty

OpenResty doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3297 audited HSTS sites and 57 audited OpenResty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or OpenResty?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or OpenResty?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (403 ms vs 505 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or OpenResty for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback