Skip to content

HSTS vs OpenResty

Based on 2916 and 50 real audits

View HSTS details | View OpenResty details
MetricHSTSOpenRestyWinner
Performance5046HSTS
Accessibility8883HSTS
Best Practices8786HSTS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7267HSTS
TTFB373ms519msHSTS
Composite7673HSTS
Performance
HSTS
50
OpenResty
46
Accessibility
HSTS
88
OpenResty
83
Security
HSTS
72
OpenResty
67
SEO
HSTS
91
OpenResty
90
Composite
HSTS
76
OpenResty
73

HSTS outperforms OpenResty in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). OpenResty leads in no categories.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenResty

OpenResty doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2916 audited HSTS sites and 50 audited OpenResty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or OpenResty?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or OpenResty?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (88 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or OpenResty?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (373 ms vs 519 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or OpenResty for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback