Based on 3294 and 3 real audits
| Metric | HSTS | Oracle BlueKai | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 29 | HSTS |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | HSTS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 77 | HSTS |
| SEO | 92 | 87 | HSTS |
| Security | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| TTFB | 403ms | 333ms | Oracle BlueKai |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | HSTS |
HSTS outperforms Oracle BlueKai in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Oracle BlueKai leads in TTFB.
Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Oracle BlueKai when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3294 audited HSTS sites and 3 audited Oracle BlueKai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback