Skip to content

HSTS vs Osano

Based on 3637 and 67 real audits

View HSTS details | View Osano details
MetricHSTSOsanoWinner
Performance5431HSTS
Accessibility9088HSTS
Best Practices9085HSTS
SEO9290HSTS
Security7465HSTS
TTFB421ms316msOsano
Composite7873HSTS
Performance
HSTS
54
Osano
31
Accessibility
HSTS
90
Osano
88
Security
HSTS
74
Osano
65
SEO
HSTS
92
Osano
90
Composite
HSTS
78
Osano
73

HSTS outperforms Osano in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Osano leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Osano

Choose Osano when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3637 audited HSTS sites and 67 audited Osano sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Osano?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Osano?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Osano?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Osano?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Osano?
Osano sites show lower Time to First Byte (316 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Osano for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback