Skip to content

HSTS vs Osano

Based on 2556 and 65 real audits

View HSTS details | View Osano details
MetricHSTSOsanoWinner
Performance4931HSTS
Accessibility8988HSTS
Best Practices8885HSTS
SEO9190HSTS
Security7065HSTS
TTFB364ms322msOsano
Composite7573HSTS
Performance
HSTS
49
Osano
31
Accessibility
HSTS
89
Osano
88
Security
HSTS
70
Osano
65
SEO
HSTS
91
Osano
90
Composite
HSTS
75
Osano
73

HSTS outperforms Osano in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Osano leads in TTFB.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Osano

Choose Osano when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2556 audited HSTS sites and 65 audited Osano sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, HSTS or Osano?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, HSTS or Osano?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, HSTS or Osano?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, HSTS or Osano?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), HSTS or Osano?
Osano sites show lower Time to First Byte (322 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose HSTS or Osano for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while HSTS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback